@support, Set to 40 in download mbps field and same for upload, then trying a speedtest results in very slow (40KBps) when setting the Download field to 6000, i get roughly 48mbps download on a speedtest.

I am using beta firmware 2.5.4b for my CUDY WR3000 v1.0. Is there any newer beta version for it? If Yes, please send it to me. Also is there a possible release date (or even month) for a stable version of 2.5? Thank you.

Hello team. I am sitting at WR11000 V1.0 with newest official FW 2.2.25-20251112-095400.

MLO is very unstable. Causes problems in mesh mode. So I had to disable it, turning router into considerably lower tier device.

On top of this problem, QoS settings is very deficient in functionality. Limits are not enforced at all. So, device with limit 16 Mbps / 4 Mbps (2/0.5 MB/s) download/upload easily downloads at 120 Mbps spped, completely tanking latency sensitive traffic like gaming which actually needs mere 0.160 ~ 0.320 Mbps.

Secondly, while functionality of limits is already questionable. Lack of global rate limiting is rather big oversight. Because modern Android/Apple phones use MAC randomization for privacy. Therefore assigning limits manually to such devices is nothing more than short-lived setting which then clutters configuration menu.

Would you kindly send me link to latest stable beta firmware which enables proper QoS functionality?

Then, in current FW, following URL is enabled, but misbehaves:
/cgi-bin/luci/admin/services/qos/limit
It shows bunch of editable fields with: “kbytes”. Which is followed with table of currently configured QoS devices showing: “Download Rate”+"Upload Rate" as “Mbps”.
And 1st column with “MAC-Address” is partly incorrectly populated.

Confirming configuration in this broken menu will write (apply) duplicate “MAC-Address” to any number of configured devices, possibly causing even bigger problems in logic which is supposed to decide what rate limit to use. And one should wipe such table clean before setting everything again to proper values.

Thanks for your reply and work improving software for such a good hardware.
- – - -
Btw, is there technical documentation exactly describing which antenna is used for which band. If some are shared. And which should be in same orientation for best beam-forming functionality? And how this changes when router is in horizontal/vertical orientation.

@Dear Gary Shell,
I just tested it. Here is normal. Please tell what speed you limit on the router and what is the test speed?

“Hi Cudy Team,

I’ve been testing the new 2.5 beta firmware and noticed a possible issue with the Global QoS feature.

The QoS fields are labeled as Mbps, however the values entered do not appear to correspond directly to Mbps. Based on my testing, the values seem to behave more like KB/s (kilobytes per second) rather than Mbps. For example, entering a value that should represent a specific speed in Mbps results in much lower throughput than expected, while entering a value equivalent to that speed in KB/s produces the expected result.

Could you please confirm what units the Global QoS fields are currently using? If the feature is intended to use KB/s, the UI label may need to be corrected. If it is intended to use Mbps, there may be a conversion issue in the firmware.

Additionally, while the new QoS implementation is a welcome improvement, it would be great to see support for modern Smart Queue Management (SQM) technologies such as FQ-CoDel or CAKE in future releases. These algorithms are highly effective at reducing bufferbloat and maintaining low latency for gaming, voice calls, and video conferencing while the connection is under load.

Thanks for the continued development and for providing access to the beta firmware."

@Dear Murat,
Our technical support has sent you the firmware via email. Please check.

“I am looking forward to the 2.5 series of firmwares, as i suffer from unusuble web interface due to constant page refresh (WR6500H) and also seriosly need features like multiple vpn client configs and packet capture. Could you please send the latest betas of WR6500H 1.0 US and TR3000 1.0 US? Thanks.”